What is the practical difference in how DLA for children and PIP assess a claimant's needs?

Full answer

Because DLA for children and PIP use fundamentally different assessment philosophies, families are often surprised that a young person's eventual PIP award does not simply mirror what they received under DLA as a child, even where the underlying condition has not changed. **DLA for children -- comparative, age-based assessment** DLA for children asks whether the child needs substantially more looking after or supervision, or has significantly more difficulty getting around, than a non-disabled child of the SAME AGE would typically need -- this comparative approach (rather than an absolute functional test) reflects the reality that even non-disabled young children need considerable care and supervision, so DLA is specifically assessing the EXTRA care/mobility difficulty attributable to the disability or health condition, above and beyond ordinary childhood needs at that age. Claims are usually assessed on the basis of a detailed claim form and supporting evidence (such as reports from a GP, paediatrician, or school), often without a face-to-face assessment. **PIP -- absolute, points-based functional assessment** PIP instead assesses the claimant's own ability to reliably, safely, and in a reasonable time carry out a defined list of specific daily living activities (such as preparing food, managing medication, washing and bathing, communicating, engaging with other people, managing money) and mobility activities (planning and following a journey, moving around), scoring points against detailed descriptors for each activity -- there is no direct comparison to what a non-disabled person of the same age would typically be able to do; the test is simply whether the claimant themselves can reliably perform the specific activity to the required standard. **Why this can produce different outcomes at the age-16 transition** Because the underlying test is structured so differently, a young person who received a high level of DLA (reflecting substantially more supervision needs than a typical child of their age) might not automatically score enough PIP points under the different, activity-specific PIP descriptors, particularly if their difficulties are primarily about needing supervision/prompting (which DLA captures well through its broad care component) rather than a physical inability to perform a specific listed PIP activity -- conversely, some young people end up with a HIGHER PIP award than their previous DLA rate might have suggested, if their specific difficulties map closely onto activities that score highly under the PIP descriptors. **The PIP assessment process itself** PIP claims typically involve completing a detailed PIP2 "How your disability affects you" form, followed in most cases by an assessment (face-to-face, by phone, or video call) with a health professional working for an assessment provider contracted by the DWP, who then produces a report used by a DWP decision maker to determine the final award -- this is a notably different process from many DLA for children claims, which can often be decided on paper evidence alone. **Worked example** A 15-year-old with a learning disability receives the middle rate care component of DLA, reflecting that she needs considerably more prompting and supervision with daily tasks than other 15-year-olds, even though she can physically perform most tasks unaided. When she transitions to PIP at 16, the assessment focuses on her actual ability to reliably complete specific listed activities (such as preparing a simple meal, or engaging with unfamiliar people) -- if she can, in fact, physically complete many of these specific activities when directly prompted or supported (even if she needed general supervision throughout the day under the broader DLA comparative test), she may score fewer points under the PIP descriptors than her previous DLA rate might suggest, potentially resulting in no award or a lower-rate PIP award despite her underlying condition being unchanged. **Practical tip** When preparing for the DLA-to-PIP transition at 16, families should focus specifically on describing concrete, real-world examples of difficulty with each PIP-relevant activity (rather than general statements about needing "supervision"), since the PIP assessment framework rewards specific, activity-based evidence far more than the broader comparative approach that worked well for a DLA claim.

Try the calculator

More answers

• Does a disabled child get PIP or DLA?