Comparison · Business Insolvency · 2026
CVA vs Administration UK 2026: Business Insolvency Options Compared
When a limited company is struggling with debts it cannot pay, a Company Voluntary Arrangement and Administration are two of the main formal rescue routes — but they work very differently in terms of who stays in control and what protection they offer. This guide compares both for 2026.
TL;DR - 30-Second Summary
- - CVA: directors stay in control, company keeps trading, needs 75% creditor approval by value
- - Administration: an administrator takes control, statutory moratorium on creditor action, often leads to a sale
- - Both aim to rescue the company or improve creditor outcomes versus liquidation
- - Always take advice from a licensed insolvency practitioner before choosing a route
Side by Side
| Feature | CVA | Administration |
|---|---|---|
| Who controls the business | Directors, IP supervises | Administrator |
| Statutory moratorium | Limited/none for most companies | Yes, automatic |
| Creditor approval | 75% by value must approve | Not required to appoint |
| Trading continues? | Usually, as normal | Sometimes, under administrator |
| Typical outcome | Repayment plan, company survives | Rescue, sale, or move to liquidation |
| Relative cost | Generally lower | Generally higher |
Verdict
A CVA suits a company with an underlying viable business, willing creditors, and directors who want to keep running it while restructuring debt. Administration suits a company facing more urgent creditor pressure (such as an imminent winding-up petition) that needs the automatic moratorium, or where a sale of the business as a going concern is the most realistic way to protect jobs and value. Both routes require a licensed insolvency practitioner from the outset — speak to one early, as options narrow the longer a company delays acting on financial difficulty.