Pillar Guide · Updated July 2026
UK Child Arrangements Orders: A Practical Guide for 2026/27
When separated parents cannot agree who a child should live with or how contact should work, either can apply to the family court for a child arrangements order. This pillar guide explains the mandatory mediation step (MIAM), how to complete and submit the C100 application, what happens at each court hearing, the welfare checklist that governs every decision, how parental responsibility is affected, and what happens if an order is breached.
What a Child Arrangements Order Is
A child arrangements order is a court order made under section 8 of the Children Act 1989 that sets out the practical arrangements for a child following parental separation: who the child lives with (the “lives with” provision, formerly called a residence order) and who the child spends time with or otherwise has contact with (the “spends time with” provision, formerly a contact order). Since April 2014 these were merged into a single order type, reflecting a policy shift away from language that implies one parent “wins” residence while the other is reduced to a visitor.
An order can specify detailed arrangements — which days and overnight stays, handover times and locations, arrangements for school holidays and special occasions, and how indirect contact (phone or video calls) should work — or it can be relatively broad, leaving flexibility for the parents to agree details between themselves. Courts generally prefer parents to reach their own agreement wherever safely possible, only imposing detailed terms where necessary.
A shared “lives with” order (previously called shared residence) can be made where a child spends substantial time with both parents, even if not a strict 50/50 split — the order does not need to reflect equal time to use shared wording, and the label itself can matter for practical purposes such as Child Benefit and school registration.
The MIAM Requirement
Before applying to court for most family law orders, including a child arrangements order, an applicant must normally attend a Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting (MIAM) — a short meeting with an accredited family mediator to explain how mediation works and assess whether the dispute is suitable for it. The aim is to divert cases that could be resolved without court involvement, reducing cost, delay and conflict for the family.
A range of statutory exemptions apply and mean the MIAM can be skipped, including: evidence of domestic abuse within the last two years (a defined list of acceptable evidence such as a police caution, non-molestation order, or a letter from a registered health professional); a child protection concern with social services involvement; genuine urgency (such as a risk the child will be removed from the jurisdiction); the applicant being unable to attend for disability or other reasons; or the other party's location being unknown.
If no exemption applies and the applicant has not attended a MIAM, the court can refuse to issue proceedings or direct the applicant to attend one before continuing. Family mediation is often significantly cheaper and faster than litigation and, where successful, produces a consent order that the court can approve without a contested hearing.
Applying: The C100 Form
The application is made on form C100, either through the online MyHMCTS/gov.uk family court service or by post to the local family court. Where the applicant is alleging, or responding to allegations of, domestic abuse or a risk of harm to the child, form C1A is completed alongside the C100 to set out the concerns in detail, which the court takes into account when deciding how to list and manage the case.
The current court fee for a C100 application is £232 (2026), payable when the application is submitted. Fee remission (a full or partial reduction) is available for applicants on qualifying low income or receiving certain means-tested benefits, applied for via the separate EX160 fee remission form or the equivalent online process.
Once issued, the court sends notice of the application to the respondent, and Cafcass (or Cafcass Cymru in Wales) carries out initial safeguarding checks, including contact with each parent and a check against police and local authority records, before the first hearing.
The FHDRA and Court Process
The First Hearing Dispute Resolution Appointment (FHDRA) is normally listed within a few weeks of the application being issued. A Cafcass officer typically attends to report on the safeguarding checks and to help the parties explore whether an agreement can be reached on the day, with the judge or magistrates available to approve any agreement as a consent order.
If the case does not settle at the FHDRA, the court gives directions for the next steps — which might include a full Cafcass welfare report under section 7 of the Children Act 1989, statements from each parent, and in some cases a fact-finding hearing to determine disputed allegations (particularly of domestic abuse) before welfare issues can be assessed. The case then proceeds to a Dispute Resolution Appointment and, if still unresolved, a final contested hearing where a judge makes a binding decision.
Throughout the process the court operates a “no order” principle: it will not make an order at all unless doing so is better for the child than making no order, reflecting a preference for parents reaching their own workable agreement wherever it is safe and realistic to do so.
The Welfare Checklist
The child's welfare is the court's paramount consideration in every decision about their upbringing, under section 1(1) of the Children Act 1989. Section 1(3) lists specific factors — the welfare checklist — that the court must have regard to:
- The ascertainable wishes and feelings of the child, considered in light of their age and understanding
- The child's physical, emotional and educational needs
- The likely effect on the child of any change in their circumstances
- The child's age, sex, background and any characteristics the court considers relevant
- Any harm the child has suffered or is at risk of suffering
- How capable each parent, and any other relevant person, is of meeting the child's needs
- The range of powers available to the court under the Children Act 1989
Older children's wishes carry increasing weight, though the court is not bound by them and always balances them against welfare and safety considerations. A child's views are usually gathered indirectly through Cafcass rather than the child giving evidence directly, to protect them from the burden of the adult dispute.
Parental Responsibility
A child arrangements order does not remove or reduce parental responsibility. Mothers automatically have parental responsibility from birth. Fathers married to the mother at the time of birth (or who later marry) automatically have it too. An unmarried father acquires parental responsibility by being named on the birth certificate (registrations from 1 December 2003 onward), by a parental responsibility agreement with the mother, or by court order.
Both parents with parental responsibility must generally be consulted on major decisions — schooling, non-emergency medical treatment, religious upbringing, and taking the child abroad for more than a short holiday. A parent named as the child's main residence in a “lives with” order cannot unilaterally exclude the other parent from these decisions unless a separate specific issue order or prohibited steps order addresses the particular dispute.
Breach and Enforcement
If a parent does not comply with the terms of a child arrangements order, the other parent can apply back to the same court for enforcement. The court's first step is usually to understand why the order was not followed — genuine welfare concerns are treated very differently from simple unwillingness to cooperate.
Where non-compliance is unjustified, the court has a graduated range of powers: it can vary the order to make it more specific or add safeguards, direct attendance at a Separated Parents Information Programme, make an enforcement order requiring unpaid work (introduced by the Children and Adoption Act 2006), or order compensation for financial loss caused by the breach (such as a wasted holiday booking). In the most serious and persistent cases, the court can treat the breach as contempt of court, which can carry a fine or, exceptionally, committal to prison.
Courts strongly prefer proportionate, welfare-focused enforcement over punitive measures, recognising that imprisoning a parent is rarely in the child's interests — the emphasis throughout is on restoring workable arrangements rather than punishing the adults.
Grandparents and Other Family Members
Parents, guardians and anyone with an existing child arrangements order in their favour can apply for a child arrangements order without needing the court's permission. Grandparents and other relatives generally need to apply for permission (leave) first, unless the child has lived with them for at least three years, they already hold a relevant order, or another automatic-standing category applies.
When deciding whether to grant leave, the court considers the nature of the proposed application, the applicant's connection with the child, and any risk that the application itself could disrupt the child's life to a degree that outweighs its purpose. Once leave is granted, the standard MIAM, C100 and welfare-checklist process applies in the same way as for a parent.
Costs and Legal Aid
Legal aid for private law children proceedings is heavily restricted. It is generally only available where the applicant can produce qualifying evidence of domestic abuse or a child protection concern (a defined evidence list, such as a police caution, protective order, or referral from social services) and where the applicant passes the means and merits tests.
Without qualifying evidence, most parents fund the process privately (solicitor fees vary widely by region and complexity), use mediation (typically far cheaper than litigation and often the fastest route to an agreed outcome), or represent themselves as litigants in person, supported by court and third-sector guidance such as the Personal Support Unit / Support Through Court service available at most family courts.